Committee: Sustainable Development
Topic: 21st Century Concerns over Energy Security

Author: Ryan Gilliam

 

Committee Background:

            The Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was created in 1992 as a result of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, also known as the Earth Summit, held in Brazil the same year. The Framework Convention on Climate Change, the Convention on Biological Diversity, the Rio Declaration and the Forest Principles were all signed and endorsed at the Earth Summit. An important 300 page document known as Agenda 21 was also adopted at this time.

Agenda 21 outlines a vision for achieving sustainable development in the 21st century. Key subject areas are divided into various Chapters. Chapters 4 and 5 of Agenda 21 deal with changing consumption patterns and demographic dynamics and sustainability. With respect to energy security, chapters 4 and 5 include the following program areas:

1.      Focusing on unsustainable patterns of production and consumption.

2.      Developing national policies and strategies to encourage changes in unsustainable consumption patterns.

3.      Developing and disseminating knowledge concerning the links between demographic trends and factors and sustainable development.

4.      Formulating integrated national policies for environment and development, taking into account demographic trends and factors.

5.      Implementing integrated, environment and development programmes at the local level, taking into account demographic trends and factors.

The 53 member states of the CSD serve 3-year terms. The mandate guiding all initiatives undertaken within the CSD is witnessed in its mission statement of “development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

 
Statement of the problem: What is energy security?

            Energy security, a term which reflects a nation’s ability to meet its energy demands, can be depicted as a triangle, with politics, raw material and economics at its corners. In discussing energy resources, undoubtedly the three are linked. Political superpowers, along with nations fortunate to have an abundance of raw materials, notably fossil fuels, are continually shifting the price point of energy.

            In discussing energy security, there are multiple threats to energy supply that need to be addressed. First, political pressure coupled with the availability of raw materials has the power to both manipulate and suspend energy supplies. Second, physical damage to energy infrastructure, either through natural disasters, industrial accidents, terrorism or warfare, can decrease or cut off energy availability. Third, increased competition for energy resources, due to the industrialization of many Non-Annex 1 countries, has unbalanced the scales between supply and demand. Fourth, with the increased focus on carbon emissions, through international efforts like the Fourth Assessment by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, international pressure is pushing towards a change in energy usage [1].

            Taking into account these threats on energy supply, there are a number of specific concerns that must be addressed to ensure energy security.

First, there is a fear that we have reached the worlds limits in regards to fossil fuel extraction and production. Depleting and consuming supplies beyond what can be replaced.

Second, since the worlds supply of oil and fossil fuels is supplied by only a few nations, many countries rely on foreign sources of energy. How can those nations ensure that their future energy demands will be met? How does geopolitics come into play? Oil and fossil fuel exports come from some of the most volatile political regions in the world. To sustain energy demands are countries willing to support dictatorship nations or nations involved in international terrorism? How can the world as a whole meet the energy needs of poorer countries? What impact does the industrialization of large nations like China and India have on the world’s natural resource supply? Stemming from this argument, how are humans contributing to climate change? Does the current energy sector need to switch its production focus to ensure cleaner, greener energy is being used?

Lastly, should the world community set regulations on fossil fuel and oil and push towards renewable and alternative energy sources [2]?

            This issue is complex and lends itself to many different discussion topics. The aim of the committee will be to differentiate between these topics and decide what specific points need to be addressed short term, and what points need to be addressed in the long term. As you will see when reading through this report, the issue of energy security has long been on the discussion floor within the United Nations; however, no concrete solutions have been put in place. It is the aim of this committee to start proposing answers to these questions.

 

History of the problem: Why are we worried about energy security?
           
Talk around energy security and energy sustainability has existed ever since the first light bulb was turned on and the first car was driven. In the early days, oil was so abundant and cheap, that the limiting factor in the process was finding enough barrels in which to store the oil. In a series of articles by David S. Scott in the alternative energy journal, “International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,” he takes the reader through the evolution of energy technologies and discusses how different energy sources and technologies were developed to meet demands set by society. It is in this vein that he discusses energy security and sustainability. What will it take to make humans change their focus to more renewable or clean energy sources? Will it be the interplay between supply and demand, high levels of greenhouse gas emission, or will something else cause a change in focus?

            Energy, without question, is the life blood of a nation. Without it, industries can’t produce, vehicles can’t move, and societies based on energy fall. This has been evidenced throughout history with the first major impact coming from the 1973 Oil Crisis.

In 1973, the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Companies (OAPEC) halted shipment of petroleum to countries which had supported Israel during the Yom Kippur War [3,4]. Affects from the oil embargo were immediate. In the United States, prices of oil quadrupled, over twenty percent of the countries gasoline stations had no fuel, and consumption of oil across the United States dropped by over twenty percent [4]. This was a wake up call for both the western world and Third World states. The political and economical power that was derived from natural resources became evident and new policies, from nation to nation, to deal with these situations were underway.

            It should be noted here that OAPEC is not that same organization as OPEC (Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries). OPEC, which was formed in 1960, aims to co-ordinate and unify petroleum policies among petroleum producing companies to ensure an efficient, economic and regular supply of petroleum to consuming nations [5], where as OAPEC’s aim is to provide support to the Arab oil industry [6].

            In 1979, the second major energy crisis occurred. Anti-Shah protests in Iran ground its oil industry to a halt, suspending oil exports [7]. In total, OPEC’s oil production decreased by nearly one fifth, escalating the price point of oil once again. In the wake of the 1973 and 1979 oil crises, nations around the world started discussing and seeking answers to energy security. Japan started exploring alternative energy sources and began conserving energy through mass transport initiatives.

            Not to belabour the point, but there are a few other international incidents that are worth discussing to develop a clearer understanding of where the specific concerns of the international community were manifested in the “Statement of the Problem” outlined above. In 1990, during the Gulf War, the Iraqi army set fire to the oil fields in Kuwait as they retreated back to Iraq [8]. This destruction of infrastructure caused another spike in oil prices which was accommodated for by other member nations of OAPEC.

In 2000, deregulation and market manipulation caused an electricity crisis throughout the state of California [9]. Through privatizing energy, market instability and lack of rules led to rolling blackouts and price escalation. In the same year, a fuel protest in the United Kingdom, as well as in other European countries, caused fuel prices to reach an all time high and contributed to substantial loses in other sectors such as transportation, health care, food distribution, and financial and governmental services [10].

The last examples that will be discussed are the Russia-Belarus and Russia-Ukraine energy disputes. Russia, one of the worlds leading energy producers, supplies a significant portion of Europe’s energy which is transported through pipelines mainly in the Ukraine and in Belarus [11]. The different factions were at odds over the cost to purchase the natural gas as well as the cost to transport it. These disputes led to various cut offs in the flow of energy which affected many European nations who depend on natural gas from Russia.

            In looking at all of the different energy related issues that have occurred over the past few decades, it is apparent that for a nation to maintain energy security, or for the world as a whole to maintain energy security and sustainability, many different points need to be taken into consideration. From politics to damage of infrastructure, from war to governmental regulations, there are many different factors which can cause energy crises. Each of these different issues has helped in developing policies and strategies to deal with energy shortages that may occur in the short term. The question is now, how do we deal with these issues for the long term?

 

Past UN/International Actions: 
            The first actions with respect to energy security came in the wake of the 1973 Oil Crisis. The Group of Five, which was established in the mid 1970’s and consisted of France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States, came together to coordinate economic policies between nations [12]. The 1973 Oil Crisis, which caused a rise in inflation as well as global economic instability, was an eye opening experience for the leading industrial nations. For an organization like OAPEC to have so much influence over world energy supplies and economics was a clear indicator of the importance of energy security.

            Following the Cold War, in the early 1990’s, Europe launched a political initiative to overcome economic divisions. Focusing on the energy sector, Eurasia realized the advantages that would come from developing an energy cooperation framework. This framework became known as the Energy Charter. The charter set out multilateral rules to create a level playing field for all participating nations. In 1994, The Energy Charter Treaty and the Energy Charter Protocol on Energy Efficiency and Related Environmental Aspects entered into legal force. The charter was designed to decrease risks associated with energy related investments and trade [13].

In 1992, through the formation of the Committee for Sustainable Development, Agenda 21, which is one of the most important documents that has been drafter with respect to sustainable development, came into play. As mentioned in the outset, both Chapters 4 and 5 of Agenda 21 discuss topics specifically related to energy security and energy sustainability. Chapter 4 looks specifically at unsustainable patterns of production and consumption. Specifically, focus is given to “how economies can grow and prosper while reducing the use of energy and materials and the production of harmful materials.” The Chapter discusses the need for “greater efficiency in the use of energy and resources” as well as encourages the “use of new and renewable sources of energy.” For our global economy to sustain the current levels of energy demand, new energy technologies are needed [14].

In Chapter 5, the fine balance between population and sustainability is addressed with respect to current consumption patterns and the impact on our planet. Based on our current population growth and energy consumption rates, the world will not be able to meet its energy demands unless new technologies or a change in energy consumption patterns and efficiencies is introduced [15].

The Committee on Sustainable Energy, a branch of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), which was formed earlier this decade, is the principal intergovernmental body “responsible for promoting international cooperation in the field of energy [16].” At their 12th session, held in November of 2002, the committee introduced energy security as part of sustainable energy strategies. As a goal, the committee called for a periodic exchange on energy security and sustainable energy, an analysis of the reliability of data on energy supplies and industries related to energy security to enhance the transparency and efficiency of energy markets, internet based information exchanges on the subject, and continued assessment of energy security and energy efficiency in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) [17].

Last year, the UNECE Energy Security Forum, under the Committee on Sustainable Energy, compiled a report for the G8 summit. The report concluded “that global energy security risks have increased sharply.” The reasoning behind the increased risks was steeply rising energy import demands in developing countries, the narrowing margin between supply and demand, the volatility of oil prices due to international tensions and terrorism, the concentration of known fossil fuel reserves in a limited number of regions, and restricted access for development of these fossil fuel reserves. The report suggested that countries could mitigate these risks by promoting investment in the energy sector, and through having open data and information sharing [18].

Under the United Nations Economic and Social Council, the Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific has been looking at energy security for sustainable development with respect to least developed and landlocked developing countries. At their 8th session, held in May of 2007, the committee outlined a strategy to increase energy security for said nations. Specific focus was given to the development of energy infrastructure and energy services for poverty reduction, as well as to enhanced cooperation for energy trade and exchange [19]. For less developed nations, the threat of rising energy prices and instability of supply is of great concern. Since these countries are unable to compete with more developed countries for energy import, it is crucial that these countries develop a system to provide support to nations in the same economic class.

Earlier this year, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change compiled what is known as the Fourth Assessment Report. In total, there were three separate working groups that contributed to the report. Working Group I looked at the physical science basis behind climate change, producing a summary for policy makers [20]. Working Group II discussed impacts, adaptation and vulnerability with respect to climate change [21]. Working Group III developed a technical summary on how to mitigate issues related to climate change [22]. In the technical report produced by Working Group III, the effect of current energy usage on the recent global warming phenomenon was outlined. Chapter 4 of the technical report discusses Energy Supply and the status of the current energy sector. Based on its findings, the report outlines that in the future, lack of security with respect to oil and gas supplies will cause an energy shift towards coal, nuclear energy and/or renewable energies. In this report, the question is raised as to how will countries, who are trying to meet ever increasing energy demands, be able to do so while limiting economic costs, ensuring energy security, and minimizing effects on their environment [22]. Although a very long report, it does provide some suggestions that may help countries in doing so. For this particular committee, this is a question that must be at the forefront of discussion.         

Coinciding with our conference this year, the UNECE Energy Week which is looking specifically at Investing in Energy Security, is being held in Geneva, November 26-30. As we discuss energy security in our council, undoubtedly we will touch upon many of the topics that will be discussed at Energy Week. Upon finishing the conference, make sure that you read up on what was achieved at the UNECE Energy Week! 

            In this article, I have only covered a small fraction of the UN and international organizations that have been established to combat the issues around energy security and sustainable energy. Dependent upon your nation, there are a multitude of different resources and committees available to research. Based on the economic stance of your nation and your nation’s abundance or lack of fossil fuel reserves, the questions that need answering vary. In any event, the fundamental question in the end is still the same. How are you going to ensure that your nation has enough energy to meet its demands and continue to grow?

 

Questions a Resolution Must Answer:

The following is a compilation of some of the issues and questions put forth by the committees and organizations outlined in the prior sections. For a resolution to be effective, it must answer questions regarding energy usage, energy efficiency, the role of alternative energy sources, development of new energy infrastructure, mitigation of the effects energy production has on the environment, international policies and procedures, as well as guidelines for sharing of information between nations and world organizations.

 

1.      Investment into the research and development of alternative power and fuel. This includes hydrogen fuel technology, biodiesel, solar and photovoltaic energy, geothermal energy, tidal and wave energy, wind energy, hydroelectric and fusion power.

2.      From a given nations standpoint, how to:

- Reduce dependency on one source of imported energy

- Increase the number of suppliers

- Exploit native fossil fuels or renewable energy sources

- Reduce overall demand through energy conservation.

3.      Develop an open dialogue for information dissemination. This could be done through electronic publishing, annual energy security forum sessions, etc.

4.      How can the world avoid situations like the 1973 Oil Crisis in the future? Is it fair for countries to use political pressure to manipulate and suspend energy supplies?

5.      How can the world protect its current energy infrastructure?

6.      In looking at the balance between supply and demand, how is the world going to meet the growing energy needs of developing nations like China and India?

7.      How does global warming come into play? Do regulations and policies need to be put in place to reduce greenhouse gas emissions? How would these policies affect energy production?

8.      How can individual nations who rely on importing energy supplies ensure that their future energy demands will be met?

 

References:  

1.      Economic and Social Council, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Sustainable Energy. 12th Session, 20-21 November 2002.

2.      Energy Security, http://www.globalissues.org/energy/

3.      “The Mideast Oil Crisis”, http://library.thinkquest.org/20331/history/mideast.htm

4.      Sarah Horton, “The 1973 Oil Crisis”, http://www.ccds.charlotte.nc.us/History/MidEast/04/horton/horton.htm

5.      Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, http://www.opec.org/home/

6.            Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries, http://www.oapecorg.org/

7.      James A. Philips, “The Iranian Oil Crisis”, http://www.heritage.org/Research/MiddleEast/bg76.cfm 

8.      The world oil market in the shadow of the gulf war”, Economic Bulletin, Volume 28 (2), April 1991.

9.      Jerry Taylor and Peter VanDoren, “California’s Electricity Crisis”, http://www.ksg.harvard.edu/hepg/Papers/cato.calif%20elec%20crisis.taylor%20&%20van%20doren.7-3-01.pdf

10.    Impact of September 2000 Fuel Price Protests on UK Critical Infrastructure”, http://www.iwar.org.uk/cip/resources/PSEPC/fuel-price-protests.htm

11.    Lionel Beehner, “Russia’s Energy Disputes”, http://www.cfr.org/publication/12327/russias_energy_disputes.html

12.    “A Guide to Committees, Groups, And Clubs”, http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/groups.htm

13.    “The Energy Charter”, http://www.encharter.org/

14.    Agenda 21 – Chapter 4: Changing Consumption Patterns http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21chapter4.htm

15.        Agenda 21 – Chapter 5: Demographic Dynamics and Sustainability http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/agenda21/english/agenda21chapter5.htm

16.    United Nations Economic Commission for Europe: Sustainable Energy Division, http://www.unece.org/ie/se/introsu.html

17.    United Nations Economic and Social Committee: Committed on Sustainable Energy. Thirteenth Session, 19-21 November 2003.

18.        UNECE Energy Security Forum report for G-8 Summit Received by Russian Government, http://www.unece.org/press/pr2006/06sed_p03e.htm

19.    United Nations Economic and Social Council: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Landlocked Developing Countries. Eighth Session, 15-16 May 2007.

20.    Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

21.    Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Fourth Assessment Report.

22.    Technical Summary: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

 

Further Suggested Bibliography:

1.            Committee for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/about_us/aboutus.htm

2.            United Nations Global Compact, www.unglobalcompact.org

3.            United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, http://www.unece.org/ie/

4.            UN Millennium Development Goals, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

5.            Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) - http://www.ipcc.ch/  

6.            UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs: Division for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/

7.            Energy Information Administration: Official Energy Statistics from the U.S. Government on Energy Security, http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/security/

8.            Institute for the Analysis of Global Security: Energy Security, http://www.iags.org/es.html

9.            General Assembly, 19th Special Session, Agenda item 8. Resolution S/19-2.

CLOSE THIS WINDOW