Our Mission
To advocate for:
• Modernized blast monitoring and exposure tracking standards.
• Clear VA service-connection pathways for blast-related injury.
• Transparent data collection and public accountability.
• Congressional and Federal Agency oversight to ensure implementation of monitoring, research, mitigation, and care standards.
To be an informational resource for:
• Veterans and Service members.
• Caregivers, spouses, significant others.
• Clinicians, medical providers, and healthcare professionals.
• Congressional and Federal Agency legislative teams, and policy teams.

Blast Overpressure Act 2026
COWAC has crafted a proposed bill, the BOAA 2026, to amend Title 38, United States Code, to establish presumptive service connection for disabilities associated with occupational blast overpressure exposure, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to promulgate implementing regulations, to provide for survivors of deceased veterans, to establish a dedicated funding mechanism within the Cost of War Toxic Exposures Fund, to require the Department of Defense cost-sharing, and for other purposes.
Science and Information
Latest on Published Blast Overpressure Research on Pubmed
by Antony Sutherland on April 20, 2026 at 10:00 am
Repetitive low-level blast overpressure exposure is an increasingly recognized occupational hazard for military, law enforcement, and specialist breaching personnel. Unlike high-level blast exposures that commonly result in overt traumatic brain injury, acute low-level blast events have not been demonstrated to produce clinically detectable concussion or neurological injury in isolation. Nevertheless, growing concern has emerged that repeated low-level blast exposure may impart cumulative…
by Jena’ N Mazique on March 12, 2026 at 10:00 am
CONCLUSION: Together, these findings indicate that blast-induced vestibular injury involves both peripheral and central components, with progressive changes in vestibular afferent activity that could influence sensory inputs to the CNS.
by Nicholas W Kuehl on November 6, 2025 at 11:00 am
Measuring and recording blast exposure to military personnel from shoulder-fired weaponry or improvised explosive devices to correlate health outcomes like mild traumatic brain injury has been a goal for many years. To ensure overpressure is recorded, sensor manufacturers either recommend multiple sensors on different parts of the body or have integrated multiple sensors into one unit. Despite this, knowing the sensor orientation in relation to the blast source is important to know if it’s a…
Frequently Asked Questions
What is occupational blast overpressure exposure (OBOE)?
Occupational blast overpressure exposure refers to the cumulative neurological stress caused by repeated exposure to blast waves generated by weapons systems in training and combat environments — artillery, mortars, breaching charges, heavy weapons, and similar platforms. Unlike a single catastrophic blast event, OBOE is the product of hundreds or thousands of lower-level exposures accumulated over a career. The brain registers each one, and the damage compounds over time. Current Department of Defense/Department of War medical protocols are now being developed to detect and track it.
Who is at risk?
Veterans and active-duty servicemembers who served in combat arms or combat support occupational specialties with routine exposure to heavy weapons systems. This includes but is not limited to artillerists, mortarmen, tankers, combat engineers, special operations personnel, and breaching teams. The August 2024 DEPSECDEF Memorandum (OSD005281-24) identifies a roster of high-risk Military Occupational Specialties across all branches — a significant institutional acknowledgment that this population carries a distinct and documented exposure burden.
What are the health consequences?
The peer-reviewed literature documents a range of neurological and neuroendocrine consequences associated with repetitive low-level blast exposure, including chronic traumatic encephalopathy spectrum disorders, persistent post-concussive syndrome, cognitive impairment, mood dysregulation, sleep disruption, and pituitary dysfunction. These conditions are chronic, often progressive, and frequently misattributed to PTSD or other causes delaying diagnosis and VA service-connection claims.
Why hasn’t this been addressed already?
The evidentiary record on repetitive occupational blast exposure has been building for years. What continues to occur is institutional lag, largely based on fiscal concerns. The Department of War (formerly Department of Defense) has begun to take strides to acknowledge and monitor exposure. However, it is still working on mitigation. Yet, within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), recognition and treatment are ill-defined or absent, and Congress has yet to compel hearings on the issue to inform legislative priorities. COWAC exists specifically to apply sustained, evidence-based pressure on all three fronts.
What is COWAC asking Congress and the VA to do?
What is COWAC asking Congress and the VA to do?
Our legislative agenda has four pillars:
- Modernized blast exposure monitoring within the Department of War. Mandatory, longitudinal blast dosimetry across all designated high-risk Military Occupational Specialties — with individualized exposure tracking, threshold-based medical evaluation triggers, and centralized reporting that supports long-term epidemiological research throughout a servicemember’s career, not only after a documented traumatic event.
- Presumptive VA service-connection pathways for blast-related neurological injury. Recognition of qualifying neurological conditions — including chronic traumatic encephalopathy spectrum disorders, persistent post-concussive syndrome, and related cognitive and neuroendocrine dysfunction — as presumptively service-connected for veterans with documented service in high-risk MOS designations.
- Passage of the Precision Brain Health Research Act (S. 800). Targeted federal investment in the neuroimaging, biomarker, and longitudinal cohort research needed to close the diagnostic and adjudicatory gap that currently keeps blast-exposed veterans from recognition and care.
- Mandatory transparency and independent oversight of blast-related health data held by the Department of War and the Department of Veterans Affairs, including public reporting of aggregate exposure data by branch and specialty, independent audit authority over relevant research programs, and full disclosure of internal findings bearing on service-connection determinations.
These four pillars are the minimum credible response to a documented occupational injury affecting an identifiable population of combat arms veterans. Each is grounded in peer-reviewed evidence, achievable through existing legislative and regulatory mechanisms, and consistent with precedents Congress has already set under the Agent Orange Act, the Gulf War Act, and the PACT Act.
Why is funding a barrier if the science supports action?
It shouldn’t be – but it is. In the current Congressional environment, even broadly supported legislation can stall when the question of budgetary offset becomes the primary obstacle rather than the underlying merits. COWAC recognizes this dynamic and addresses it directly: the cost of inaction is not zero. Blast-exposed veterans whose injuries go unrecognized are already generating significant federal expenditure through misattributed VA disability claims, inadequate mental health treatment, and the long-term costs of unmanaged neurological disease.
The fiscal question facing Congress is not whether to fund a response to occupational blast overpressure exposure, it is whether to fund it intentionally through targeted research and streamlined service-connection pathways, or to continue absorbing its costs invisibly and inefficiently through a system that does not yet have the right tools to address them. We believe the former is not only the moral choice, it is the fiscally defensible one. COWAC engages directly with Congressional budget and appropriations staff to make that case, and we welcome any office willing to work through the fiscal architecture of a serious response.
I’m a veteran. How do I know if this applies to me?
If you served in a combat arms or heavy weapons role and are experiencing neurological symptoms – cognitive difficulties, persistent headaches, mood changes, memory problems, sleep disruption, or other post-concussive symptoms – your occupational history is clinically relevant and you may have a viable VA service-connection claim. We encourage you to speak with a clinician familiar with blast-related neurological injury, and consult a veteran service organization or accredited claims agent about your options. COWAC’s evidence materials are available to share with your treating provider and accredited VA representative.
I’m a clinician. What resources does COWAC have for me?
We have developed a comprehensive Clinician and Medical Provider Reference document that covers the exposure mechanism, the relevant peer-reviewed literature, diagnostic considerations, and guidance for Independent Medical Opinion preparation in support of VA claims. A veteran may also present a request for an Independent Medical Opinion (IMO) – Occupational Blast Overpressure Exposure (OBOE) along with a copy of their military service and personnel records and clinical records for contemporaneous review.
How does COWAC work with other veteran service organizations?
We actively seek coalition partnerships with VSOs who share a commitment to evidence-based advocacy for combat arms veterans. We are not in competition with peer organizations — we see collaboration as a force multiplier. If your organization works with blast-exposed veterans or has an interest in the neurological health policy space, we welcome a conversation about how we can support each other’s work.
Is COWAC a partisan organization?
No. The neurological health of combat arms veterans is not a partisan issue, and COWAC does not operate as one. We engage with legislators, committee staff, and federal agencies on the merits — bringing data and veteran testimony to every office regardless of party. We have found allies on both sides of the aisle and intend to keep it that way. Our only criterion is willingness to look at the evidence and act on it.
How can I get involved or support COWAC’s work?
Our community of more than 3,000 active members includes veterans, military families, clinicians, researchers, and advocates. If you want to add your voice and sign the Petition, connect with us on social media, share our materials with your networks, or reach out directly about partnership, testimony, or other forms of engagement. Every credible voice that joins this effort strengthens the case for the veterans we represent. Contact us through the form on our contact page.





